June 2011, Week 1


Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Portside Moderator <[log in to unmask]>
Thu, 2 Jun 2011 22:12:18 -0400
text/plain (89 lines)
Antiwar Battleground in the House

GOP Pulls Libya War Powers Resolution from the Floor Because it Might Pass

By Donny Shaw

Beaver County Peace Links via OpenCongress.org

June 1, 2011



The House Republican leadership is worried that Congress
might stand up to the Obama Administration and assert its
constitutional prerogative as the only branch of government
that can declare war. The House was scheduled to vote this
afternoon on a a privileged resolution from Rep. Dennis
Kucinich [D, OH-10] directing the President, pursuant to the
War Powers Act, to remove U.S. armed forces from Libya. But
the House leadership has pulled it from the floor because,
according to Republican aides who spoke with Fox News, "it
became clear that it might succeed."

    "[Republican leaders] hadn't seen much of a threat from
    [the Kucinich bill]. He's kind of this marginal figure
    and having his resolution go down narrowly would be no
    big deal and might even send a message to the
    administration," said one of the Republican aides. "But
    once they saw that there was substantial support, they
    were like, `Whoa.'"

Under the War Powers Act of 1973, if a President authorizes
military action without approval from Congress, they must
terminate the action within 60 days unless they get specific
approval from Congress, or unless there is a national
emergency due to an attack on the U.S. In the case of Libya,
the 60-day period has come and gone without any action from
Congress, yet, in a direct violation of the law, U.S.
military involvement in Libya continues. In fact, it has now
been extended for another 90 days.

The Obama Administration argues that Libya is not a U.S.
mission. It's a NATO mission, they say. But as Kucinich
points out in a letter to supporters of his resolution, the
U.S. is still in charge. "The fact remains that we're
bombing another country and we pay, by far, the largest
percentage of NATO's military bills," he says. "This is a
war that we're leading - and it's a war that violates our
Constitution and the War Powers Act."

According to a new poll, the public seems to back Kucinich
and his allies. When asked by CNN pollsters who should have
final authority for deciding whether the U.S. should
continue its use of military force in Libya - Congress or
President Obama - 55% of respondents answered Congress.

House Republicans have been actively working to expand
presidential war powers. They recently added language to the
annual Defense authorization bill that expands presidential
authority to use military force without consent from
Congress against virtually anybody suspected of being a
terrorist, anywhere in the world (including domestically),
indefinitely. Obviously, the growing support for Kucinich's
resolution is a significant challenge to their unilateral-
executive-war-power agenda. So, it's been postponed,
supposedly "in an effort to compel more information and
consultation' from the Administration," but actually just to
give the Republican leadership more time to twist arms.


Portside aims to provide material of interest to people
on the left that will help them to interpret the world
and to change it.

Submit via email: [log in to unmask]

Submit via the Web: http://portside.org/submittous3

Frequently asked questions: http://portside.org/faq

Sub/Unsub: http://portside.org/subscribe-and-unsubscribe

Search Portside archives: http://portside.org/archive

Contribute to Portside: https://portside.org/donate