Material of Interest to People on the Left 




 Rebecca Greenfield 
 January 13, 2018
Los Angeles Times

	* []

 _ The U.S. Labor Department rolled out new guidelines this month that
make it easier for companies that want to hire interns but don’t
want to pay them. _ 

 Jim Lo Scalzo / European Pressphoto Agency, Led by Alexander Acosta,
the Labor Department changed the rules on unpaid internships. 


The U.S. Labor Department rolled out new guidelines this month that
make it easier for companies that want to hire interns but don’t
want to pay them.

The new rules establish a “primary beneficiary test” that ratifies
programs that help the intern more than the company. Seven factors
determine whether the gig meets the standard. One says internships
should provide training that “would be similar to that which would
be given in an educational environment.” Another says the intern’s
job should complement, not displace, the work of paid employees.

Unlike the previous standard, an unpaid internship doesn’t
necessarily have to meet any prescribed threshold related to those
seven factors. Each internship program will be justified on its own
merits, a more forgiving benchmark for employers.

“This standard that the department is setting forth is easier for
companies to satisfy in terms of internships qualifying as unpaid,”
said Paul DeCamp, an attorney at Epstein Becker & Green who works with

The old test was six factors, one of which prohibited employers from
deriving “immediate advantage from the activities of the intern.”
Companies found that standard overly rigid, arguing that it was
difficult for most internships to meet that requirement.

“If the intern did any productive work for the company it would —
at least based on the strict reading of the test — be required that
activity be paid, which is, not to put too fine a point on it,
ridiculous,” DeCamp said.

The new federal guidelines apply in California, as the state doesn’t
have policies or case law on the topic, said Shadie Berenji, an
attorney specializing in labor and employment.

The change is a response in part to a string of intern lawsuits
starting in 2011, when two former interns at Fox Searchlight Pictures
[] filed
a lawsuit alleging that their employer violated the Fair Labor
Standards Act by not paying them for work they did on the movie
“Black Swan.” In 2013, a court ruled in their favor, finding that
their roles fell short of the Labor Department’s six criteria for
unpaid internships.

That decision was reversed in 2015 by the U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of
Appeals in New York, which found the government’s standards too
rigid. The court established its own criteria, and that became the
basis for the new Labor Department rules. (The Fox Searchlight interns
settled with the company for amounts ranging from $495 to $7,500.)

Eric Glatt, one of the plaintiffs in the Fox Searchlight case, said he
had mixed feelings about the new guidelines. Although they give new
latitude to companies that don’t want to pay interns, they may also
improve the training and education that interns get.

“I don’t like the legal implications of this new test,” Glatt
said. “But the practical implications may make the kinds of
internships that I did” — entry-level jobs disguised as
educational opportunities — “go away.”

DeCamp also suspects fewer companies will rely on interns for menial
tasks and little else. “If the intern is primarily doing grunt work
— not learning skills, not learning about the industry, but is
simply replacing work that would’ve been done by paid employees and
therefore amounting to nothing other than free labor and with no
discernible benefit to the intern — I think courts would still be
willing to say that is employment,” DeCamp said.

But some labor advocates worry that under the new guidelines, a
company can justify any program, no matter how basic, as benefiting
the intern.

“You could say working in the industry, even if you’re doing
relatively mundane tasks, gives you some knowledge of how the industry
works,” said Patricia Smith, senior council at the National
Employment Law Project.

For example, a lawsuit filed by interns at Hearst Corp.
[] argued
that they did menial work with no supervision or formal training. The
judge ruled in favor of the media company, noting that many of the
interns aspired to careers in fashion and entertainment and that one
had accomplished her goal of having “real-life experience” in her

After the wave of lawsuits, many companies, especially in media,
started to pay their interns, and the new rules won’t necessarily
reverse the trend. “It’s safer,” Decamp said. “If it’s at
all in doubt, just pay minimum wage.”


	* []







 Submit via web [] 
 Submit via email 
 Frequently asked questions [] 
 Manage subscription [] 
 Visit []

 Twitter []

 Facebook [] 



To unsubscribe, click the following link: