LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for PORTSIDE Archives


PORTSIDE Archives

PORTSIDE Archives


PORTSIDE@LISTS.PORTSIDE.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PORTSIDE Home

PORTSIDE Home

PORTSIDE  September 2011, Week 3

PORTSIDE September 2011, Week 3

Subject:

Obama Job Plan: the Promise & the Drawbacks

From:

Portside Moderator <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Sat, 17 Sep 2011 12:45:19 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (365 lines)

Left Margin

Cover Story

Obama Job Plan: the Promise and the Drawbacks

By Carl Bloice BlackCommentator.com Editorial Board
BC
September 15, 2011

http://www.blackcommentator.com/441/441_cover_lm_job_plan.php

More than once in the morning after the President's
jobs speech, I had the same conversation: "it's more
than I expected." "It's a far cry from enough." "It
doesn't really matter because the Republicans will kill
it."

BC Question: What will it take to bring Obama
home?Therein lay the quandary for progressives. Should
we rally around a program that is deficient, or
continue to press for more effective measures? My
answer has been: both.

Unquestionably, passage of the American Jobs Act would
be a good thing. As the President outlined it, the
proposal aims to "to put more people back to work and
more money in the pockets of those who are working,"
and "create more jobs for construction workers, more
jobs for teachers, more jobs for veterans, and more
jobs for long-term unemployed." To say that it doesn't
matter is to turn our backs on the millions of people
out there struggling to maintain themselves and their
families amid a faltering economy. "It's not nearly as
bold as the plan I'd want in an ideal world," wrote
economist Paul Krugman. "But if it actually became law,
it would probably make a significant dent in
unemployment."

Will the jobs plan "provide a jolt to an economy that
has stalled, and give companies confidence that if they
invest and if they hire, there will be customers for
their products and services"? Well, it's hard to say.
Every day, the economic crisis appears to get worse.
The President says the economy has stalled. Some
economists suggest it has stalled like an airplane that
has lost engine power and is poised to begin another
descent. Combine what is happening here at home with
developments in Europe and you have the makings of this
current crisis of capitalism turning really ugly.

At the moment, it seems to me, we should endeavor to
put aside our policy wonk hats and concentrate on the
politics of the situation. The battle lines are pretty
clear: It's the White House proposal, or doing nothing.
There's nothing else on the table. AFL-CIO President
Richard Trumka holds out hope that the pot will be
sweetened. "The plan announced by the president is only
the opening bid," he said. "We expect to see more
proposals in the next weeks and months to put America
back to work."

We shall see.

The danger remains that those in the Administration's
camp who are never anything but political operatives
will prevail, opportunity will give way to political
expediency and fall prey to the notion that the 2012
election trumps all. That camp argues that all that
matters is the vote of ill-defined "independents" and
everything must be "bi-partisan" That notion should
have been put to rest by the most recent Republican
Presidential candidates debate. The GOP has no plan for
job creation. The candidates presented a united front:
the issue in the next election is "Obama." They seem to
have figured out that the public is more concerned with
unemployment than deficit reduction, and if the jobs
crisis is to be pinned on the President then surely
nothing should be done to alleviate it over the next 13
months.

"Helping the country is unlikely to be enough of an
incentive for Republicans to pass a bill, any bill,
that Obama supports, even a bill, like this one, that
is assembled mostly from refurbished spare parts
collected from their own ideological warehouse," wrote
Hendrik Hertzberg in The New Yorker blog. "No doubt
many of them sincerely believe that the end (upping the
chances of defeating Obama and his nefarious agenda of
turning America into a socialist hellhole like Western
Europe) justifies the means (deepening the extent of
mass unemployment, human suffering, and ancillary
damage to the economy and to society)."

The Republican approach to tackling unemployment was
well summed up by Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), who said
the party was hoping the President would roll back
regulations, take up entitlement reform, facilitate the
production of more energy, and spur free-trade
agreements.

Obama has already done too much regulation reform with
his relaxation of air quality standards. Of course, the
GOP wants to take a hatchet to Social Security,
Medicare and Medicaid. More energy means mountain top
strip mining, and dangerous shale oil pipelines,
courtesy of the big oil companies. As far as trade
pacts are concerned, Corker evidently wasn't listening
when Obama said, " Now it's time to clear the way for a
series of trade agreements that would make it easier
for American companies to sell their products in
Panama, Colombia, and South Korea - while also helping
the workers whose jobs have been affected by global
competition. If Americans can buy Kias and Hyundais, I
want to see folks in South Korea driving Fords and
Chevys and Chryslers. I want to see more products sold
around the world stamped with three proud words: `Made
in America.'"

That's another question. In the real world, such
agreements are not the panacea they are touted to be;
sometimes they have devastating effects on working
people at both ends of the pacts.

Then, there was the out-to-lunch John Podhoretz writing
in the New York Post that the President "did propose
incentives to private-sector employers, but those
incentives do not involve much in the way of lessening
their regulatory or tax burden. Obama mentioned he had
initiated a review of onerous federal regulations but
had so far identified only 500 he could do away with."

Only 500? (I cringe to think what they might be).

"And he spoke once again of making the wealthy pay more
in taxes, which directly affects the ability of small-
business owners to employ more people," Podhoretz went
on. Actually the two things have very little to do with
each other. The Administration's proposed hiring-tax
incentives are intended for small business.

"The President has delivered a good start for putting
Americans back to work that includes elements we as
progressives have been calling for," read a joint
statement from Congressional Progressive Caucus co-
chairs Reps. Raul M. Grijalva and Keith Ellison
following the president's speech. "Our country will
finally make essential repairs to America's roads and
bridges. Wall Street and multi-millionaires will start
to pay their fair share and support the country that
has helped them prosper. The long-term unemployed, who
have been hit hardest by the recession, will have the
support they need while they find jobs."

"For eight months, the Republicans have successfully
paralyzed the national conversation by holding the
people's business hostage. They have shown no interest
in putting the livelihoods of millions of working
families ahead of their own narrow political goals.
They have refused to take job creation seriously. As a
result, we have seen record numbers of laid-off
teachers, returning veterans struggling to find work,
and firefighters and first responders hurting for
funding."

"The crisis is so severe that we must do more than the
president has proposed," the Caucus leaders said
September 9. "That's why next week the Congressional
Progressive Caucus will unveil our Framework to Rebuild
the American Dream. It offers a bold, comprehensive
progressive vision for America based on what we can do,
not the Tea Party vision of what America can't do. As
we showed with the People's Budget, we can create
millions of jobs and eliminate the deficit within ten
years if we choose the right priorities and make good
decisions."

"We join the President in calling on Congressional
Republicans to put the national interest ahead of
partisan stonewalling. We stand ready to move forward
and put American families back to work."

Back to the quandary.

A reoccurring theme in much of the media commentary on
the Obama proposals has been futility, summed up by a
Washington Post columnist's declaration that "long
before the speech, both sides had concluded it didn't
much matter: Obama has become too weak to enact
anything big enough to do much good."

"I thought it was a great speech," the columnist quoted
Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.) as saying. "But the odds of
Obama getting his plan through Congress are probably as
good as the Nationals winning the league this year."

Liberal columnist, Harold Meyerson, called the
President's speech: "Good plan, good vision, good
politics - That was an enlivened President Obama we saw
earlier this evening - impassioned, indignant, non-
professorial," he wrote in the Washington Post. "And
enlivened he should have been, because the American
economy trembles on the brink of a double-dip
recession, and the Republican opposition has been
seized by an ideology that would erode what remains of
the once-great American middle class. Not to mention,
Obama's own political future and that of his party are
on the line as well."

"The size and the substance of this new stimulus give
Obama and his party the ability not only to rally many
of his disenchanted core supporters but to reach out to
voters in the middle of the political spectrum," wrote
Meyerson. "That's partly because more than half the
package - roughly $240 billion - takes the form of a
one-year payroll tax reduction for employees and
employers that will be difficult for Republicans to
oppose. The tax credits for employees who hire veterans
are also a political winner, though the tax credit for
companies that hire the long-term unemployed (which in
Republican-speak will mean minorities, whose votes
they're not going to get anyway) is one that the GOP is
almost sure to resist. Also likely to meet a Republican
rejection are Obama's proposals to build roads and
schools, and to fund the retention and rehiring of tens
of thousands of teachers."

Perhaps the most overused word this year has been
"compromise" and we're going to hear it a lot more over
coming weeks. The danger here is that if the
compromisers in the Administration - the ones too often
anxious to split the difference with the opposition -
hold sway, the Republicans and their "blue dog
Democratic allies will get what their corporate backers
want (the tax cut part) while the long-term jobless,
the teachers, students and poor people are left out in
the cold.

But wait. It gets worse. Those who want to take a knife
to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid are still
lurking out there. And the President isn't helping
matters with his repeated ambiguous statements about
"reforming" Medicare. He says this is necessary because
of "an aging population and rising health care costs"
Why not tackle the latter instead of taking from the
elderly? Robert Borosage of the Campaign for America's
Future noted "the president went out of his way once
more to put Medicare and Medicaid on the table for a
grand bargain with Republicans for dramatic deficit
reduction over the next decade. He promised to detail
this in another presentation next week, threatening to
once more deflate the debate we need over jobs with a
return to a debate that is utterly divisive over
deficit reduction."

Then, there is another problem with the President's
plan. "Putting Americans back to work is also critical
to keeping Social Security and Medicare strong," says
Max Richtman, president of the National Committee to
Preserve Social Security and Medicare. "However, this
proposal to extend and expand the payroll tax cut
threatens Social Security's independence by forcing the
program to compete for limited federal dollars from
general revenues, and by breaking the link between
contributions and benefits. As we predicted back in
December, `There's no such thing as a temporary tax
cut.' Just months after being reassured that diverting
contributions from Social Security would last for just
one year, Congress is now being asked to extend and
even increase this diversion of payroll taxes for
another year. Doubling-down by also cutting employer
contributions greatly worsens the situation, and makes
it even harder to restore the Social Security system to
self-financing. If this extension passes, there is no
guarantee that Congress won't be asked to extend it yet
again, for a 3rd or even a 4th year or longer, and
expand it even more, making it a de facto permanent
part of the tax code. This is death by a thousand cuts.

"Social Security is paid for, earned by, and promised
to American workers. We call on the President and the
Congress to reaffirm the fact that Social Security has
been, is, and will continue to be, a self-financed
insurance program; and that this temporary payroll tax
cut does not constitute a precedent that would
undermine this principle."

Ari Berman wisely asked in The Nation, "Could Obama's
to-be-determined deficit speech undermine the momentum
from his jobs speech? Perhaps," he continued, "The
president left open the possibility for significant
changes to Medicare and Medicaid, which won't be
popular with many Americans. The super-committee still
has the power in Washington. Once its deadline nears,
the conversation may once again revolve around deficits
instead of jobs, especially since there's no built-in
incentive forcing the committee to focus on jobs, as
compared to the triggered spending cuts."

Labor leader Trumka Richard L. Trumka clearly senses
the danger here. In the P.S. to his statement welcoming
the President's speech, he said. "Some politicians
claim cuts to our social safety net, deregulation and
lower taxes for the rich will fix our problems. But
they're flat wrong. If we continue down this road, it
only will destroy more jobs and send us into a vicious
downward spiral. Our country is too good and too rich
to weaken our commitment to safety net protections such
as Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and unemployment
insurance.

"We don't have time to waste on the same old failed
policies that drove our economy off a cliff in the
first place. Tell Congress: Working families will judge
our elected leaders by whether they act with integrity
and energy to create good jobs now."

"Progressives are demanding action on jobs," wrote
Borosage. "An inspired president on the stump is vital
to making that case. His agenda is a first step,
designed to attract bipartisan support. If Republicans
oppose this, they will be turning their backs on
working people, either out of misguided ideological
extremism, or for partisan political advantage. The
president is right. It is time to act.

"President Obama has taken a step in the right
direction with his speech and jobs plan. It was a small
step - but it has to be to present Republicans with the
choice to cooperate or get pushed out of the way," said
Dave Johnson of the Campaign for America's future. "If
this passes it is a win for jobs and the economy - and
therefore the President's re-election. If Republicans
block it, the President wins because voters will push
Republicans out and the country will be able to get
moving again. But it all depends on follow-through. The
President has to keep out there, pounding on this, and
only this, every single day until there is a vote.
Every. Single. Day. That is the key."
____________

BlackCommentator.com Editorial Board member Carl Bloice
is a writer in San Francisco, a member of the National
Coordinating Committee of the Committees of
Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism and formerly
worked for a healthcare union.

___________________________________________

Portside aims to provide material of interest to people
on the left that will help them to interpret the world
and to change it.

Submit via email: [log in to unmask]

Submit via the Web: http://portside.org/submittous3

Frequently asked questions: http://portside.org/faq

Sub/Unsub: http://portside.org/subscribe-and-unsubscribe

Search Portside archives: http://portside.org/archive

Contribute to Portside: https://portside.org/donate

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

March 2019, Week 4
March 2019, Week 3
March 2019, Week 2
March 2019, Week 1
February 2019, Week 4
February 2019, Week 3
February 2019, Week 2
February 2019, Week 1
January 2019, Week 5
January 2019, Week 4
January 2019, Week 3
January 2019, Week 2
January 2019, Week 1
December 2018, Week 5
December 2018, Week 4
December 2018, Week 3
December 2018, Week 2
December 2018, Week 1
November 2018, Week 5
November 2018, Week 4
November 2018, Week 3
November 2018, Week 2
November 2018, Week 1
October 2018, Week 5
October 2018, Week 4
October 2018, Week 3
October 2018, Week 2
October 2018, Week 1
September 2018, Week 5
September 2018, Week 4
September 2018, Week 3
September 2018, Week 2
September 2018, Week 1
August 2018, Week 5
August 2018, Week 4
August 2018, Week 3
August 2018, Week 2
August 2018, Week 1
July 2018, Week 5
July 2018, Week 4
July 2018, Week 3
July 2018, Week 2
July 2018, Week 1
June 2018, Week 5
June 2018, Week 4
June 2018, Week 3
June 2018, Week 2
June 2018, Week 1
May 2018, Week 5
May 2018, Week 4
May 2018, Week 3
May 2018, Week 2
May 2018, Week 1
April 2018, Week 5
April 2018, Week 4
April 2018, Week 3
April 2018, Week 2
April 2018, Week 1
March 2018, Week 5
March 2018, Week 4
March 2018, Week 3
March 2018, Week 2
March 2018, Week 1
February 2018, Week 4
February 2018, Week 3
February 2018, Week 2
February 2018, Week 1
January 2018, Week 5
January 2018, Week 4
January 2018, Week 3
January 2018, Week 2
January 2018, Week 1
December 2017, Week 5
December 2017, Week 4
December 2017, Week 3
December 2017, Week 2
December 2017, Week 1
November 2017, Week 5
November 2017, Week 4
November 2017, Week 3
November 2017, Week 2
November 2017, Week 1
October 2017, Week 5
October 2017, Week 4
October 2017, Week 3
October 2017, Week 2
October 2017, Week 1
September 2017, Week 5
September 2017, Week 4
September 2017, Week 3
September 2017, Week 2
September 2017, Week 1
August 2017, Week 5
August 2017, Week 4
August 2017, Week 3
August 2017, Week 2
August 2017, Week 1
July 2017, Week 5
July 2017, Week 4
July 2017, Week 3
July 2017, Week 2
July 2017, Week 1
June 2017, Week 5
June 2017, Week 4
June 2017, Week 3
June 2017, Week 2
June 2017, Week 1
May 2017, Week 5
May 2017, Week 4
May 2017, Week 3
May 2017, Week 2
May 2017, Week 1
April 2017, Week 5
April 2017, Week 4
April 2017, Week 3
April 2017, Week 2
April 2017, Week 1
March 2017, Week 5
March 2017, Week 4
March 2017, Week 3
March 2017, Week 2
March 2017, Week 1
February 2017, Week 4
February 2017, Week 3
February 2017, Week 2
February 2017, Week 1
January 2017, Week 5
January 2017, Week 4
January 2017, Week 3
January 2017, Week 2
January 2017, Week 1
December 2016, Week 5
December 2016, Week 4
December 2016, Week 3
December 2016, Week 2
December 2016, Week 1
November 2016, Week 5
November 2016, Week 4
November 2016, Week 3
November 2016, Week 2
November 2016, Week 1
October 2016, Week 5
October 2016, Week 4
October 2016, Week 3
October 2016, Week 2
October 2016, Week 1
September 2016, Week 5
September 2016, Week 4
September 2016, Week 3
September 2016, Week 2
September 2016, Week 1
August 2016, Week 5
August 2016, Week 4
August 2016, Week 3
August 2016, Week 2
August 2016, Week 1
July 2016, Week 5
July 2016, Week 4
July 2016, Week 3
July 2016, Week 2
July 2016, Week 1
June 2016, Week 5
June 2016, Week 4
June 2016, Week 3
June 2016, Week 2
June 2016, Week 1
May 2016, Week 5
May 2016, Week 4
May 2016, Week 3
May 2016, Week 2
May 2016, Week 1
April 2016, Week 5
April 2016, Week 4
April 2016, Week 3
April 2016, Week 2
April 2016, Week 1
March 2016, Week 5
March 2016, Week 4
March 2016, Week 3
March 2016, Week 2
March 2016, Week 1
February 2016, Week 5
February 2016, Week 4
February 2016, Week 3
February 2016, Week 2
February 2016, Week 1
January 2016, Week 5
January 2016, Week 4
January 2016, Week 3
January 2016, Week 2
January 2016, Week 1
December 2015, Week 5
December 2015, Week 4
December 2015, Week 3
December 2015, Week 2
December 2015, Week 1
November 2015, Week 5
November 2015, Week 4
November 2015, Week 3
November 2015, Week 2
November 2015, Week 1
October 2015, Week 5
October 2015, Week 4
October 2015, Week 3
October 2015, Week 2
October 2015, Week 1
September 2015, Week 5
September 2015, Week 4
September 2015, Week 3
September 2015, Week 2
September 2015, Week 1
August 2015, Week 5
August 2015, Week 4
August 2015, Week 3
August 2015, Week 2
August 2015, Week 1
July 2015, Week 5
July 2015, Week 4
July 2015, Week 3
July 2015, Week 2
July 2015, Week 1
June 2015, Week 5
June 2015, Week 4
June 2015, Week 3
June 2015, Week 2
June 2015, Week 1
May 2015, Week 5
May 2015, Week 4
May 2015, Week 3
May 2015, Week 2
May 2015, Week 1
April 2015, Week 5
April 2015, Week 4
April 2015, Week 3
April 2015, Week 2
April 2015, Week 1
March 2015, Week 5
March 2015, Week 4
March 2015, Week 3
March 2015, Week 2
March 2015, Week 1
February 2015, Week 4
February 2015, Week 3
February 2015, Week 2
February 2015, Week 1
January 2015, Week 5
January 2015, Week 4
January 2015, Week 3
January 2015, Week 2
January 2015, Week 1
December 2014, Week 5
December 2014, Week 4
December 2014, Week 3
December 2014, Week 2
December 2014, Week 1
November 2014, Week 5
November 2014, Week 4
November 2014, Week 3
November 2014, Week 2
November 2014, Week 1
October 2014, Week 5
October 2014, Week 4
October 2014, Week 3
October 2014, Week 2
October 2014, Week 1
September 2014, Week 5
September 2014, Week 4
September 2014, Week 3
September 2014, Week 2
September 2014, Week 1
August 2014, Week 5
August 2014, Week 4
August 2014, Week 3
August 2014, Week 2
August 2014, Week 1
July 2014, Week 5
July 2014, Week 4
July 2014, Week 3
July 2014, Week 2
July 2014, Week 1
June 2014, Week 5
June 2014, Week 4
June 2014, Week 3
June 2014, Week 2
June 2014, Week 1
May 2014, Week 5
May 2014, Week 4
May 2014, Week 3
May 2014, Week 2
May 2014, Week 1
April 2014, Week 5
April 2014, Week 4
April 2014, Week 3
April 2014, Week 2
April 2014, Week 1
March 2014, Week 5
March 2014, Week 4
March 2014, Week 3
March 2014, Week 2
March 2014, Week 1
February 2014, Week 4
February 2014, Week 3
February 2014, Week 2
February 2014, Week 1
January 2014, Week 5
January 2014, Week 4
January 2014, Week 3
January 2014, Week 2
January 2014, Week 1
December 2013, Week 5
December 2013, Week 4
December 2013, Week 3
December 2013, Week 2
December 2013, Week 1
November 2013, Week 5
November 2013, Week 4
November 2013, Week 3
November 2013, Week 2
November 2013, Week 1
October 2013, Week 5
October 2013, Week 4
October 2013, Week 3
October 2013, Week 2
October 2013, Week 1
September 2013, Week 5
September 2013, Week 4
September 2013, Week 3
September 2013, Week 2
September 2013, Week 1
August 2013, Week 5
August 2013, Week 4
August 2013, Week 3
August 2013, Week 2
August 2013, Week 1
July 2013, Week 5
July 2013, Week 4
July 2013, Week 3
July 2013, Week 2
July 2013, Week 1
June 2013, Week 5
June 2013, Week 4
June 2013, Week 3
June 2013, Week 2
June 2013, Week 1
May 2013, Week 5
May 2013, Week 4
May 2013, Week 3
May 2013, Week 2
May 2013, Week 1
April 2013, Week 5
April 2013, Week 4
April 2013, Week 3
April 2013, Week 2
April 2013, Week 1
March 2013, Week 5
March 2013, Week 4
March 2013, Week 3
March 2013, Week 2
March 2013, Week 1
February 2013, Week 4
February 2013, Week 3
February 2013, Week 2
February 2013, Week 1
January 2013, Week 5
January 2013, Week 4
January 2013, Week 3
January 2013, Week 2
January 2013, Week 1
December 2012, Week 5
December 2012, Week 4
December 2012, Week 3
December 2012, Week 2
December 2012, Week 1
November 2012, Week 5
November 2012, Week 4
November 2012, Week 3
November 2012, Week 2
November 2012, Week 1
October 2012, Week 5
October 2012, Week 4
October 2012, Week 3
October 2012, Week 2
October 2012, Week 1
September 2012, Week 5
September 2012, Week 4
September 2012, Week 3
September 2012, Week 2
September 2012, Week 1
August 2012, Week 5
August 2012, Week 4
August 2012, Week 3
August 2012, Week 2
August 2012, Week 1
July 2012, Week 5
July 2012, Week 4
July 2012, Week 3
July 2012, Week 2
July 2012, Week 1
June 2012, Week 5
June 2012, Week 4
June 2012, Week 3
June 2012, Week 2
June 2012, Week 1
May 2012, Week 5
May 2012, Week 4
May 2012, Week 3
May 2012, Week 2
May 2012, Week 1
April 2012, Week 5
April 2012, Week 4
April 2012, Week 3
April 2012, Week 2
April 2012, Week 1
March 2012, Week 5
March 2012, Week 4
March 2012, Week 3
March 2012, Week 2
March 2012, Week 1
February 2012, Week 5
February 2012, Week 4
February 2012, Week 3
February 2012, Week 2
February 2012, Week 1
January 2012, Week 5
January 2012, Week 4
January 2012, Week 3
January 2012, Week 2
January 2012, Week 1
December 2011, Week 5
December 2011, Week 4
December 2011, Week 3
December 2011, Week 2
December 2011, Week 1
November 2011, Week 5
November 2011, Week 4
November 2011, Week 3
November 2011, Week 2
November 2011, Week 1
October 2011, Week 5
October 2011, Week 4
October 2011, Week 3
October 2011, Week 2
October 2011, Week 1
September 2011, Week 5
September 2011, Week 4
September 2011, Week 3
September 2011, Week 2
September 2011, Week 1
August 2011, Week 5
August 2011, Week 4
August 2011, Week 3
August 2011, Week 2
August 2011, Week 1
July 2011, Week 5
July 2011, Week 4
July 2011, Week 3
July 2011, Week 2
July 2011, Week 1
June 2011, Week 5
June 2011, Week 4
June 2011, Week 3
June 2011, Week 2
June 2011, Week 1
May 2011, Week 5
May 2011, Week 4
May 2011, Week 3
May 2011, Week 2
May 2011, Week 1
April 2011, Week 5
April 2011, Week 4
April 2011, Week 3
April 2011, Week 2
April 2011, Week 1
March 2011, Week 5
March 2011, Week 4
March 2011, Week 3
March 2011, Week 2
March 2011, Week 1
February 2011, Week 4
February 2011, Week 3
February 2011, Week 2
February 2011, Week 1
January 2011, Week 5
January 2011, Week 4
January 2011, Week 3
January 2011, Week 2
January 2011, Week 1
December 2010, Week 5
December 2010, Week 4
December 2010, Week 3
December 2010, Week 2
December 2010, Week 1
November 2010, Week 5
November 2010, Week 4
November 2010, Week 3
November 2010, Week 2
November 2010, Week 1
October 2010, Week 5
October 2010, Week 4
October 2010, Week 3
October 2010, Week 2
October 2010, Week 1
September 2010, Week 5
September 2010, Week 4
September 2010, Week 3
September 2010, Week 2
September 2010, Week 1
August 2010, Week 5
August 2010, Week 4
August 2010, Week 3
August 2010, Week 2
August 2010, Week 1
July 2010, Week 5
July 2010, Week 4
July 2010, Week 3
July 2010, Week 2
July 2010, Week 1

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.PORTSIDE.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager