December 2018, Week 4


Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Portside <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Fri, 28 Dec 2018 23:03:20 -0500
text/plain (9 kB) , text/html (20 kB)

 		 [The special counsel investigation into Russian meddling and
possible collusion is notoriously leak-proof but it could soon touch
Trump directly or members of his family] [https://portside.org/] 

2019?   [https://portside.org/node/18992] 


 Tom McCarthy 
 December 28, 2018
The Guardian

	* [https://portside.org/node/18992/printable/print]

 _ The special counsel investigation into Russian meddling and
possible collusion is notoriously leak-proof but it could soon touch
Trump directly or members of his family _ 



After two years of the Donald Trump
[https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/donaldtrump] presidency, the
national stores of civic goodwill are depleted. That could make for a
testy 2019, because it appears that the country’s defining political
tensions are about to break into open clashes.

One field of battle will be Congress, where Democrats say they will
use their control of the House of Representatives to mount
investigations of Trump and his coterie. Another will be the campaign
trail, where Democrats (and maybe some Republicans) will begin to
compete to replace Trump.

But perhaps overshadowing them all is special counsel Robert
Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 US
election, and links between the Trump campaign and Moscow.

Mueller is expected to advance significant new aspects of his
investigation, which could end up targeting Trump himself in a very
public way in the new year, according to legal experts and observers.

Analysts interviewed by the Guardian uniformly warned that Mueller’s
velocity and vector are basically unknowable, because his team does
not leak private information, while salient public information, such
as Mueller’s willingness to move to the sentencing phase for
cooperative convicts such as Michael Flynn, is open to interpretation.

But the broadest possible question about what the next year might hold
in store for Mueller pertains to his core investigation of alleged
collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia and obstruction of
justice by the president, analysts said.

“I think the biggest question is, is he going to present evidence
that Trump committed crimes?” said Alex Whiting
[https://hls.harvard.edu/faculty/directory/10953/Whiting], a Harvard
law professor and former prosecutor on the international criminal
court. “Either obstruction of justice or collusion. He wouldn’t
bring an indictment because justice department policy won’t permit
it. But whatever evidence would be handed off, I think, to the
Congress, and it will have to be considered.

“That’s as big as it gets. I think that’s really – that’s
the ultimate question.”

A basic obscurity and air of secrecy still attend Mueller’s work.
For all the major developments in the Mueller investigation in 2018
– from the April raid on former Trump fixer Michael Cohen
home to the fiery Flynn sentencing hearing
[https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/dec/18/trump-michael-flynn-judge-emmet-sullivan-sentencing] earlier
this month – the public gained a relatively limited view on the
progress of Mueller’s core investigation of election tampering and
potential obstruction.

A Mueller memo describing Flynn’s “valuable” cooperation was
almost entirely redacted in sections describing Russia-related
matters. Likewise, a Cohen memo was adamantly non-specific in its
description of “core” investigative matters that Cohen helped

One of the most revealing Mueller documents to emerge was a draft plea
agreement with the conspiracy theorist Jerome Corsi
[https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/nov/26/jerome-corsi-mueller-investigation-plea-deal-rejected] revealing
that Mueller alleged that Corsi helped Trump political adviser Roger
Stone communicate with WikiLeaks, which served during the election as
a Russian cutout.

“For now, he appears to be building charges against Corsi and
Stone,” former US attorney Renato Mariotti said of Mueller.

If Trump himself would be the biggest target Mueller might approach in
2019, and Corsi or Stone would be lower-level, Mueller might also
target someone just short of the president, such as Trump’s
son, Donald Trump Jr
or his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, analysts said. Both men appear to be
legally exposed to charges of making false statements either to
investigators (as Flynn did) or to Congress (as Cohen did).

Barb McQuade
a University of Michigan law professor and former US attorney, pointed
to Mueller’s description of Cohen’s cooperation
[https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5453418-Mueller-Cohen-filing.html] and
noted that Cohen had “described the circumstances of preparing and
circulating his response to the congressional inquiries” – a
response he later admitted was false.

“That suggests there were others who were trying to get their story
straight,” said McQuade. “And I imagine that that would be an area
that Mueller would look at, to say: ‘Well, Michael Cohen told a lie.
Did anyone else tell the same lie?’

“And if they did tell that lie, number one, there are going to be
charges against them for lying to Congress but, number two, why did
they lie?

“People tend to lie under a situation as serious as that only if
they believe that the truth would be worse. And so if they’re lying
about the Trump tower Moscow, what truth about that is worse?”

Major incidents before or after the last US presidential election
could emerge as focal points for Mueller in the new year. The special
counsel might reveal new evidence about the circumstances surrounding
a June 2016 meeting at Trump Tower, or a February 2017 meeting between
Trump and Comey, at which Comey said that Trump encouraged him to drop
an investigation of Flynn.

Further criminal charges might emerge in the case of hush payments
made to the porn actor Stormy Daniels and former Playboy model Karen
McDougal, or new details might emerge of projects or prospective
projects advanced by Trump and his family in Moscow or the Middle
East. In the background would be questions about the nature of the
Trump campaign’s relationships at the time with any foreign backers.

Foreign countries and nationals are not supposed to be involved in US
campaigns or elections.

“We all at this moment know very little about where Robert
Mueller’s investigation will lead, because it has been so leak-free
and they have been so careful about keeping their cards very close to
the vest, and admirably so,” said Lisa K Griffin, a law professor at
Duke University with a focus on federal criminal justice policy.

“I don’t think anyone knows, and I think most of the conjecture
about it has been wishful thinking in both directions.”

Whiting said: “Trump has tried repeatedly to minimized this
investigation, to delegitimize it, to dismiss it, and that hasn’t
worked and it’s not going to work.

“I think this investigation and the consequences are going to be
significant and they’re here to stay, and there’s nothing he can
do about it.”

_Tom McCarthy is national affairs correspondent for Guardian US. 
Twitter @teemcsee [https://twitter.com/teemcsee]. Click here
[https://pgp.theguardian.com/PublicKeys/Tom%20McCarthy.pub.txt] for
Tom's public key_

_Invest in independent journalism. Make a year-end gift to The
Guardian. [https://support.theguardian.com/us/contribute]_

	* [https://portside.org/node/18992/printable/print]







 Submit via web [https://portside.org/contact/submit_to_portside] 
 Submit via email 
 Frequently asked questions [https://portside.org/faq] 
 Manage subscription [https://portside.org/subscribe] 
 Visit portside.org [https://portside.org/]

 Twitter [https://twitter.com/portsideorg]

 Facebook [https://www.facebook.com/Portside.PortsideLabor] 




To unsubscribe, click the following link: