|
|
|
[To see the Paul Ryan 'Tax Shelter USA' video, go to the
Mother Jones article below, or view it on YouTube at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AKo2t_W_uT4 -- moderator.]
Paul Ryan: "Let's Make This Country a Tax Shelter"
After calling the Cayman Islands "the place where
you hide your money," Ryan said we should make the
United States more like that notorious tax haven.
By Nick Baumann and Brett Brownell
Fri Oct. 5, 2012
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/10/paul-ryan-lets-make-country-tax-shelter-video
In 2010, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), now Mitt Romney's
running mate, called the Cayman Islands "the place you
hide your money," arguing that the United States needs
to slash tax rates below those of other countries in
order to make this country "a haven for capital
formation." But in previously unreported comments, from
an interview with American Business Magazine in August
2011, Ryan went even further on the same topic, saying,
"let's make this country a tax shelter for other
countries instead of having other countries be a tax
shelter for America."
Romney has been criticized for his use of controversial
tax techniques and overseas investment vehicles,
including some in the Caymans—where he has at least $30
million in assets—and other well known tax havens.
Here's how one expert described tax haven countries to
our colleague Stephanie Mencimer:
James Henry, a former chief economist at McKinsey &
Co., describes offshore tax havens like the "bar
scene in Star Wars." He explains, "Dictators and
kleptocrats used them to conceal stolen loot. Arms
dealers and drug dealers use them to launder their
deals. Google and Apple and Pfizer use them to park
their intellectual property and pay themselves tax-
free royalties. Banks use them to park lousy loans
and stash the offshore accounts and assets under
management of their wealthy individual clients,
many of which are paying zero taxes back home…And
so on."
Here's the transcript of the full Ryan interview; the
"tax shelter" line, which was pointed out to Mother
Jones by a tipster, begins at 18:22 in the full video,
which you can see here. You can also jump down to the
full Q&A.
As you can see in the charts below, the United States
already raises significantly less money (as a percentage
of GDP) from corporate taxes than most other first-world
nations, and although corporate tax rates are high here,
corporations' effective tax rates—what they actually
pay—are lower than those in most other first-world
economies.
The United States' reliance on corporate taxes has
fallen dramatically over the last 60 years. In 1952, the
government got over 30 percent of its revenue from
corporate taxes; today, that number is less than 10
percent. Many big companies, including Boeing, General
Electric, and Verizon, had negative effective tax rates
between 2008 and 2011, despite raking in billions of
dollars of profits.
Parts of the United States are already effectively
global tax shelters. Delaware, which has very lax
business formation requirements and disclosure rules, as
well as low corporate taxes, "today regularly tops lists
of domestic and foreign tax havens," according to the
New York Times. (Multiple entities associated with
Romney and Bain Capital, the private equity firm he
founded, were established in Delaware.) The Times'
Leslie Wayne has more:
"What is so galling about secrecy in the United
States is that there is no attempt to document who
owns a corporation," said Richard Murphy, a senior
adviser at the Tax Justice Network, an independent
organization based in London that researches tax
havens. "Two million corporations are formed each
year in the United States, more than anywhere else
in the world. Delaware, in turn, is the biggest
single source of anonymous corporations in the
world."
Mr. Murphy adds: "Why go to the Caymans when you
can just go down the street?"
In 2009, the Tax Justice Network named the United
States as No. 1 on its Financial Secrecy Index,
ahead of Luxembourg and Switzerland. It cited
Delaware as one of the reasons.
That, Mr. Murphy says, elicited howls in
Wilmington. "The reaction was: 'This cannot be
true.' Not only can it be true, it is true." (The
United States has since fallen to fifth place,
behind Switzerland, the Caymans, Luxembourg and
Hong Kong, after the group changed its method.)
[…]
Delaware subsidiaries are especially popular with
global energy and mining companies like Exxon,
Chevron and Rio Tinto. Among the top 10, some 915
subsidiaries have been set up in Delaware, compared
with 51 in Switzerland and 49 in the Caymans,
according to a report last September by the Norway
chapter of Publish What You Pay, a London-based
group that studies natural resources. The study
said that this allows these resource extraction
companies to put up a "wall of silence" about their
far-flung operations and profits, especially from
poor countries that may want a greater slice of the
revenue. Exxon, Chevron and Rio Tinto declined to
comment.
So, to review: The United States already collects
comparatively low amounts of corporate tax. But Ryan
wants to make the whole country like Delaware. He says
this "would ultimately raise revenues and promote
economic growth." But if the US lowers its rates,
there's nothing to stop other countries—including the
Caymans and Switzerland—from slashing their taxes and
fees and making their restrictions on corporations even
lower, too.
Here's ABM's question and Ryan's full answer:
ABM: What would you do to limit or slow the
migration of domestic business overseas?
PR: I would go to a territorial tax system. We
should make the top American tax rate 25 percent
for individuals and businesses. As you know, all
the partnerships and LLCs are taxed at the
individual rate. What the past Republican budget
says is bring those tax rates down to 25 percent on
the corporate side, as well. I think we’re shooting
ourselves in the foot the way we tax ourselves. The
rest of the world has moved toward a territorial
system and we have not.
I just met with the chief of staff to the Council
in Britain who stated not only have they just moved
to a territorial system, they’re moving their top
tax rate on businesses down to 23 percent. Ireland
is at 12.5 percent. The international average
corporate tax rate is 25 percent. We are the
highest now at 35 percent. So, we are, literally,
pushing capital overseas. Corporations are looking
overseas and the US government is making it
impossible for them to come back with their
capital. That’s giving an incentive to keep capital
overseas, not to domicile your company here, and
we’re making ourselves ripe for takeover targets.
Foreign companies are taking over US companies.
This is occurring at an alarming pace—eventually
the loyalties of these corporations will leave, as
well.
I think we need to have a tax system that makes
America a haven for capital formation. Let’s make
this country a tax shelter for other countries
instead of having other countries be a tax shelter
for America. This would ultimately raise revenues
and promote economic growth.
The way we should look at increasing revenues to
the government should not be class warfare or a
bigger than ever tax increase approach. Economic
growth comes from job creation and better economic
growth policies that raise revenue through higher
growth. Lowering tax rates at a broader base of
income brings in more revenues and would help us
close our fiscal gap.
___________________________________________
Portside aims to provide material of interest to people
on the left that will help them to interpret the world
and to change it.
Submit via email: [log in to unmask]
Submit via the Web: http://portside.org/submittous3
Frequently asked questions: http://portside.org/faq
Sub/Unsub: http://portside.org/subscribe-and-unsubscribe
Search Portside archives: http://portside.org/archive
Contribute to Portside: https://portside.org/donate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archives |
June 2013, Week 3 June 2013, Week 2 June 2013, Week 1 May 2013, Week 5 May 2013, Week 4 May 2013, Week 3 May 2013, Week 2 May 2013, Week 1 April 2013, Week 5 April 2013, Week 4 April 2013, Week 3 April 2013, Week 2 April 2013, Week 1 March 2013, Week 5 March 2013, Week 4 March 2013, Week 3 March 2013, Week 2 March 2013, Week 1 February 2013, Week 4 February 2013, Week 3 February 2013, Week 2 February 2013, Week 1 January 2013, Week 5 January 2013, Week 4 January 2013, Week 3 January 2013, Week 2 January 2013, Week 1 December 2012, Week 5 December 2012, Week 4 December 2012, Week 3 December 2012, Week 2 December 2012, Week 1 November 2012, Week 5 November 2012, Week 4 November 2012, Week 3 November 2012, Week 2 November 2012, Week 1 October 2012, Week 5 October 2012, Week 4 October 2012, Week 3 October 2012, Week 2 October 2012, Week 1 September 2012, Week 5 September 2012, Week 4 September 2012, Week 3 September 2012, Week 2 September 2012, Week 1 August 2012, Week 5 August 2012, Week 4 August 2012, Week 3 August 2012, Week 2 August 2012, Week 1 July 2012, Week 5 July 2012, Week 4 July 2012, Week 3 July 2012, Week 2 July 2012, Week 1 June 2012, Week 5 June 2012, Week 4 June 2012, Week 3 June 2012, Week 2 June 2012, Week 1 May 2012, Week 5 May 2012, Week 4 May 2012, Week 3 May 2012, Week 2 May 2012, Week 1 April 2012, Week 5 April 2012, Week 4 April 2012, Week 3 April 2012, Week 2 April 2012, Week 1 March 2012, Week 5 March 2012, Week 4 March 2012, Week 3 March 2012, Week 2 March 2012, Week 1 February 2012, Week 5 February 2012, Week 4 February 2012, Week 3 February 2012, Week 2 February 2012, Week 1 January 2012, Week 5 January 2012, Week 4 January 2012, Week 3 January 2012, Week 2 January 2012, Week 1 December 2011, Week 5 December 2011, Week 4 December 2011, Week 3 December 2011, Week 2 December 2011, Week 1 November 2011, Week 5 November 2011, Week 4 November 2011, Week 3 November 2011, Week 2 November 2011, Week 1 October 2011, Week 5 October 2011, Week 4 October 2011, Week 3 October 2011, Week 2 October 2011, Week 1 September 2011, Week 5 September 2011, Week 4 September 2011, Week 3 September 2011, Week 2 September 2011, Week 1 August 2011, Week 5 August 2011, Week 4 August 2011, Week 3 August 2011, Week 2 August 2011, Week 1 July 2011, Week 5 July 2011, Week 4 July 2011, Week 3 July 2011, Week 2 July 2011, Week 1 June 2011, Week 5 June 2011, Week 4 June 2011, Week 3 June 2011, Week 2 June 2011, Week 1 May 2011, Week 5 May 2011, Week 4 May 2011, Week 3 May 2011, Week 2 May 2011, Week 1 April 2011, Week 5 April 2011, Week 4 April 2011, Week 3 April 2011, Week 2 April 2011, Week 1 March 2011, Week 5 March 2011, Week 4 March 2011, Week 3 March 2011, Week 2 March 2011, Week 1 February 2011, Week 4 February 2011, Week 3 February 2011, Week 2 February 2011, Week 1 January 2011, Week 5 January 2011, Week 4 January 2011, Week 3 January 2011, Week 2 January 2011, Week 1 December 2010, Week 5 December 2010, Week 4 December 2010, Week 3 December 2010, Week 2 December 2010, Week 1 November 2010, Week 5 November 2010, Week 4 November 2010, Week 3 November 2010, Week 2 November 2010, Week 1 October 2010, Week 5 October 2010, Week 4 October 2010, Week 3 October 2010, Week 2 October 2010, Week 1 September 2010, Week 5 September 2010, Week 4 September 2010, Week 3 September 2010, Week 2 September 2010, Week 1 August 2010, Week 5 August 2010, Week 4 August 2010, Week 3 August 2010, Week 2 August 2010, Week 1 July 2010, Week 5 July 2010, Week 4 July 2010, Week 3 July 2010, Week 2 July 2010, Week 1
|
|