|
|
|
Reverse Mortgage Foreclosures On The Rise, Seniors
Targeted For Scams
By Ben Hallman
Huffington Post
June 27, 2012
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/27/reverse-mortgage-foreclosures_n_1631626.html
Reverse mortgages, a lifeline for seniors struggling to
pay bills in allowing them to turn home equity into
cash, are entering into foreclosure at an "alarming"
rate, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Director Richard Cordray said Wednesday.
One out of every 10 seniors with a reverse mortgage
is in default or foreclosure, Cordray said in a
conference call with reporters on Wednesday timed
to coincide with the release of a reverse mortgages
report prepared for Congress.
The agency also found that seniors often don't really
understand the terms of the loan, a problem
exacerbated by deceptive mailings and other
advertisements, Cordray said.
"We will work with our partners at the federal, state
and local level to root out these kinds of scams,"
Cordray said. He described one flier that portrayed a
reverse mortgage as a "government benefit," which is
wrong, and that contained "blatantly false
information about loan repayment options." He did
not go into further detail about who sends out these
notices but said that the agency has authority to
ensure that the reverse mortgage market works well
for consumers.
Reverse mortgages let homeowners older than 62
borrow against the equity of their home without
their having, in turn, to make any loan payments,
provided that they stay in the house. This type of
mortgage is traditionally structured so that the loan
balance will gradually increase over time. Lenders,
such as MetLife bank, which is currently the biggest
issuer of these loans, then own a greater and greater
stake in the property. Borrowers can stay in their
home even if the loan balance exceeds the home's
value, but they are still responsible for taxes and
insurance payments throughout the process. When
a borrower dies, the heir of the estate sells off the
home and repays the federally insured loan and
keeps what is left over.
The loans, however, have been controversial.
Historically, reverse mortgages have had high costs
and fees relative to traditional loans and consumer
advocates have said the benefits may not outweigh
the cost. As the CFPB notes in its report, senior
citizens are often confused about the terms of the
loans, even though a borrower wishing to obtain one
of these loans, which are typically federally insured,
must first see a qualified housing counselor.
The original purpose envisioned for reverse
mortgages was to provide a steady income stream for
retirement. But in 2011, 73 percent of such
borrowers took a lump sum payment instead. This
may be a poor financial decision, according to the
CFPB. That's because seniors often don't consider
how the interest on this debt will cause their home
equity to evaporate more quickly. In other cases,
borrowers may be saving or investing the lump-sum
proceeds and might be earning less than they are
paying in interest, the CFPB said.
More 60-somethings are also taking out reverse
mortgages, the CFPB found. This can prove a
problem should one of these seniors, who took a
lump sum, decide to move elsewhere but learn that
he or she is essentially stuck.
The two largest reverse mortgage originators, Wells
Fargo and Bank of America, exited the market in
2011. Wells Fargo cited concerns about the
reputational risks of foreclosing on seniors as a
result of tax and insurance defaults.
New reverse mortgage issues hit a peak in 2008 and
2009, rising to more than 100,000 a year, but have
since fallen rapidly to about 70,000 a year. About
582,000 reverse mortgages were outstanding as of
November 2011.
But with 32 million baby boomers poised to enter
retirement, the market for these mortgages could
rapidly grow, Cordray said.
______________
Ben Hallman is senior financial writer at The Huffington
Post, based in New York. Previously, he was a
business and finance reporter at the investigative nonprofit
The Center for Public Integrity. He has also written for
The American Lawyer and the St. Louis Post-Dispatch.
Ben has a master's degree from the University of Missouri.
He can be reached at [log in to unmask]
___________________________________________
Portside aims to provide material of interest to people
on the left that will help them to interpret the world
and to change it.
Submit via email: [log in to unmask]
Submit via the Web: http://portside.org/submittous3
Frequently asked questions: http://portside.org/faq
Sub/Unsub: http://portside.org/subscribe-and-unsubscribe
Search Portside archives: http://portside.org/archive
Contribute to Portside: https://portside.org/donate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archives |
May 2013, Week 3 May 2013, Week 2 May 2013, Week 1 April 2013, Week 5 April 2013, Week 4 April 2013, Week 3 April 2013, Week 2 April 2013, Week 1 March 2013, Week 5 March 2013, Week 4 March 2013, Week 3 March 2013, Week 2 March 2013, Week 1 February 2013, Week 4 February 2013, Week 3 February 2013, Week 2 February 2013, Week 1 January 2013, Week 5 January 2013, Week 4 January 2013, Week 3 January 2013, Week 2 January 2013, Week 1 December 2012, Week 5 December 2012, Week 4 December 2012, Week 3 December 2012, Week 2 December 2012, Week 1 November 2012, Week 5 November 2012, Week 4 November 2012, Week 3 November 2012, Week 2 November 2012, Week 1 October 2012, Week 5 October 2012, Week 4 October 2012, Week 3 October 2012, Week 2 October 2012, Week 1 September 2012, Week 5 September 2012, Week 4 September 2012, Week 3 September 2012, Week 2 September 2012, Week 1 August 2012, Week 5 August 2012, Week 4 August 2012, Week 3 August 2012, Week 2 August 2012, Week 1 July 2012, Week 5 July 2012, Week 4 July 2012, Week 3 July 2012, Week 2 July 2012, Week 1 June 2012, Week 5 June 2012, Week 4 June 2012, Week 3 June 2012, Week 2 June 2012, Week 1 May 2012, Week 5 May 2012, Week 4 May 2012, Week 3 May 2012, Week 2 May 2012, Week 1 April 2012, Week 5 April 2012, Week 4 April 2012, Week 3 April 2012, Week 2 April 2012, Week 1 March 2012, Week 5 March 2012, Week 4 March 2012, Week 3 March 2012, Week 2 March 2012, Week 1 February 2012, Week 5 February 2012, Week 4 February 2012, Week 3 February 2012, Week 2 February 2012, Week 1 January 2012, Week 5 January 2012, Week 4 January 2012, Week 3 January 2012, Week 2 January 2012, Week 1 December 2011, Week 5 December 2011, Week 4 December 2011, Week 3 December 2011, Week 2 December 2011, Week 1 November 2011, Week 5 November 2011, Week 4 November 2011, Week 3 November 2011, Week 2 November 2011, Week 1 October 2011, Week 5 October 2011, Week 4 October 2011, Week 3 October 2011, Week 2 October 2011, Week 1 September 2011, Week 5 September 2011, Week 4 September 2011, Week 3 September 2011, Week 2 September 2011, Week 1 August 2011, Week 5 August 2011, Week 4 August 2011, Week 3 August 2011, Week 2 August 2011, Week 1 July 2011, Week 5 July 2011, Week 4 July 2011, Week 3 July 2011, Week 2 July 2011, Week 1 June 2011, Week 5 June 2011, Week 4 June 2011, Week 3 June 2011, Week 2 June 2011, Week 1 May 2011, Week 5 May 2011, Week 4 May 2011, Week 3 May 2011, Week 2 May 2011, Week 1 April 2011, Week 5 April 2011, Week 4 April 2011, Week 3 April 2011, Week 2 April 2011, Week 1 March 2011, Week 5 March 2011, Week 4 March 2011, Week 3 March 2011, Week 2 March 2011, Week 1 February 2011, Week 4 February 2011, Week 3 February 2011, Week 2 February 2011, Week 1 January 2011, Week 5 January 2011, Week 4 January 2011, Week 3 January 2011, Week 2 January 2011, Week 1 December 2010, Week 5 December 2010, Week 4 December 2010, Week 3 December 2010, Week 2 December 2010, Week 1 November 2010, Week 5 November 2010, Week 4 November 2010, Week 3 November 2010, Week 2 November 2010, Week 1 October 2010, Week 5 October 2010, Week 4 October 2010, Week 3 October 2010, Week 2 October 2010, Week 1 September 2010, Week 5 September 2010, Week 4 September 2010, Week 3 September 2010, Week 2 September 2010, Week 1 August 2010, Week 5 August 2010, Week 4 August 2010, Week 3 August 2010, Week 2 August 2010, Week 1 July 2010, Week 5 July 2010, Week 4 July 2010, Week 3 July 2010, Week 2 July 2010, Week 1
|
|