LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for PORTSIDE Archives


PORTSIDE Archives

PORTSIDE Archives


PORTSIDE@LISTS.PORTSIDE.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PORTSIDE Home

PORTSIDE Home

PORTSIDE  December 2011, Week 1

PORTSIDE December 2011, Week 1

Subject:

Tiny Tax on Financial Trades Gains Advocates

From:

Portside Moderator <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Tue, 6 Dec 2011 22:57:30 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (192 lines)

Tiny Tax on Financial Trades Gains Advocates

By Steven Greenhouse and Graham Bowley 
New York Times
December 6, 2011

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/07/business/global/micro-tax-on-financial-trades-gains-advocates.html?hp=&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1323208941-mQIoTmI+1qBbTijO3q8HkA

They call it the Robin Hood tax - a tiny levy on trades in
the financial markets that would take money from the banks
and give it to the world's poor.

And like the mythical hero of Sherwood Forest, it is
beginning to capture the public's imagination.

Driven by populist anger at bankers as well as government
needs for more revenue, the idea of a tax on trades of
stocks, bonds and other financial instruments has attracted
an array of influential champions, including the leaders of
France and Germany, the billionaire philanthropists Bill
Gates and George Soros, the consumer activist Ralph Nader,
Pope Benedict XVI and the archbishop of Canterbury.

"We all agree that a financial transaction tax would be the
right signal to show that we have understood that financial
markets have to contribute their share to the recovery of
economies," the chancellor of Germany, Angela Merkel, told 
her Parliament recently.

On Sunday, Mario Monti, the new prime minister of Italy,
announced plans to impose a tax on certain financial
transactions as part of a far-reaching plan to fix his
country's budgetary problems, and he endorsed the idea of a 
Europe-wide transactions tax.

So far, the broader debt crisis engulfing the euro zone
nations has pushed discussion of the tax into the background.
But if European leaders can agree on a plan that calms the 
financial markets, they would be in a stronger position to 
enact a levy, analysts said.

"There is some momentum behind this," said Simon Tilford,
chief economist of the Center for European Reform in London.
"If they keep the show on the road, they probably will 
attempt to run with this."

The Robin Hood tax has also become a rallying point for labor
unions, nongovernmental organizations and the Occupy Wall
Street movement, which view it as a way to claw back money
from the top 1 percent to help the other 99 percent. Last
month, thousands of demonstrators, including hundreds in
Robin Hood outfits with bright green caps and bows and
arrows, flooded into southern France to urge the leaders of 
the Group of 20 nations to do more to help the poor, 
including passing a financial transactions tax.

Enacting such a tax still faces many hurdles, however - most
notably, skepticism from leaders in the United States and 
Britain, home to some of the world's most important financial
exchanges.

The day after the Robin Hood protest, for example, Mr. Gates,
the chairman of Microsoft and one of the world's wealthiest
men, presented a report to a closed-door meeting of the G-20 
leaders that laid out his ideas on how rich countries could 
aid poor ones. One of his proposals was a modest tax on 
trades of financial instruments that could generate $48 
billion or more annually from the G-20 countries.

Ms. Merkel and France's president, Nicolas Sarkozy, quickly
piped up, enthusiastically endorsing the tax. But Britain's
prime minister, David Cameron, expressed serious
reservations, saying Britain would embrace it only if it were
adopted globally. British officials fear that unless the tax
is worldwide, trading will flee London's huge markets to
countries with no tax.

The Obama administration has also been lukewarm, expressing
sympathy but saying it would be hard to execute, could drive
trading overseas and would hurt pension funds and individual
investors in addition to banks.

Administration officials say they would prefer a tax on
the assets of the largest banks as a way to discourage them
from risky activities. "The president is sympathetic to the
goals that a financial transactions tax is trying to achieve
and he is pushing for a financial crisis responsibility fee 
and closing other Wall Street loopholes as the best and most
feasible way to achieve those goals," an administration 
official said.

Still, support is growing for the idea, which has been
largely dormant since the 1970s, when a version was first
proposed by the economist James Tobin, later a Nobel Prize
winner.

"The tax is a good idea because banks are where the money is.
It's the same reason Jesse James robbed banks," said Rose Ann
DeMoro, executive director of National Nurses United, which
recently held demonstrations at the offices of 60 members of
Congress in support of the levy. "The thing about the
financial transactions tax is it's stunning how quickly
people get it and how fast they embrace it."

Labor groups like the nurses' union and the A.F.L.- C.I.O.
see the tax as a way to finance job creation programs to
fight high unemployment in the United States and Europe.
Other advocates hope it will slow the speculation that many
blame for undermining the euro and causing wild swings in
financial markets. Mr. Gates and Mr. Sarkozy would like to
use the money to finance development in the world's poorest
nations. And leaders like Ms. Merkel and some members of
Congress are eyeing it as a relatively painless source of
money to help plug government deficits.

On Nov. 16, the French Senate passed a bill supporting a
financial transactions tax. And the European Commission in
Brussels has said it would like to put a tax of $10 per
$10,000 of transactions in place throughout the European
Union by 2014, predicting it would raise 57 billion euros
($77 billion) a year in European countries alone.

Last month, Representative Peter DeFazio, an Oregon Democrat,
and Senator Tom Harkin, an Iowa Democrat, proposed an
American version of the tax that they said could raise $350
billion over 10 years.

Their legislation would impose $3 in taxes for each $10,000
in transactions. Other proposals, including those from the
nurses' union, call for a tax of $50 per $10,000.

Mr. DeFazio said his tax plan would "raise money to invest in
the real economy," but he acknowledged that it faced an
uphill battle in Washington, especially within the antitax
Republican caucus.

Opponents say that even at the rate in the DeFazio- Harkin
bill, the tax would add significantly to the cost of trading,
exceeding what institutional investors pay in commissions.

"At a time when we face a slow economic recovery, such a tax
will impede the efficiency of markets and impair depth and
liquidity as well as raise costs to the issuers, pensions and
investors who help drive economic growth," Kenneth E. Bentsen
Jr., executive vice president for public policy at the
Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, said
in a statement.

George Osborne, the British chancellor of the exchequer,
described the proposed tax as "economic suicide" for Europe.
In this time of economic crisis, he said, the European Union
"should be coming forward with new ideas to promote growth,
not undermine it."

And Glenn Hubbard, who was chairman of the Council of
Economic Advisers under President George W. Bush, said the
Robin Hood tax is a "monstrously bad idea."

"Such a tax isn't really going to get at the banks," added
Mr. Hubbard, who is now an adviser to the Republican
presidential candidate Mitt Romney. "It's going to hit the
people who own the assets that are traded," like investors.

Supporters of a financial transactions tax note that Britain
already imposes a levy of $50 per $10,000 of stocks traded,
while Hong Kong and Singapore, with fast- growing financial
markets, impose fees of $10 to $20 per $10,000 of the value
of certain transactions. The United States imposed a tiny tax
on stock trades from 1914 to 1966.

The British actor Bill Nighy, who has made online videos
promoting the tax, calls it a beautiful idea. "It would raise
enough money to solve problems at home and overseas, and it
could do it without hurting ordinary people," he said.

___________________________________________

Portside aims to provide material of interest to people
on the left that will help them to interpret the world
and to change it.

Submit via email: [log in to unmask]

Submit via the Web: http://portside.org/submittous3

Frequently asked questions: http://portside.org/faq

Sub/Unsub: http://portside.org/subscribe-and-unsubscribe

Search Portside archives: http://portside.org/archive

Contribute to Portside: https://portside.org/donate

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2013, Week 3
May 2013, Week 2
May 2013, Week 1
April 2013, Week 5
April 2013, Week 4
April 2013, Week 3
April 2013, Week 2
April 2013, Week 1
March 2013, Week 5
March 2013, Week 4
March 2013, Week 3
March 2013, Week 2
March 2013, Week 1
February 2013, Week 4
February 2013, Week 3
February 2013, Week 2
February 2013, Week 1
January 2013, Week 5
January 2013, Week 4
January 2013, Week 3
January 2013, Week 2
January 2013, Week 1
December 2012, Week 5
December 2012, Week 4
December 2012, Week 3
December 2012, Week 2
December 2012, Week 1
November 2012, Week 5
November 2012, Week 4
November 2012, Week 3
November 2012, Week 2
November 2012, Week 1
October 2012, Week 5
October 2012, Week 4
October 2012, Week 3
October 2012, Week 2
October 2012, Week 1
September 2012, Week 5
September 2012, Week 4
September 2012, Week 3
September 2012, Week 2
September 2012, Week 1
August 2012, Week 5
August 2012, Week 4
August 2012, Week 3
August 2012, Week 2
August 2012, Week 1
July 2012, Week 5
July 2012, Week 4
July 2012, Week 3
July 2012, Week 2
July 2012, Week 1
June 2012, Week 5
June 2012, Week 4
June 2012, Week 3
June 2012, Week 2
June 2012, Week 1
May 2012, Week 5
May 2012, Week 4
May 2012, Week 3
May 2012, Week 2
May 2012, Week 1
April 2012, Week 5
April 2012, Week 4
April 2012, Week 3
April 2012, Week 2
April 2012, Week 1
March 2012, Week 5
March 2012, Week 4
March 2012, Week 3
March 2012, Week 2
March 2012, Week 1
February 2012, Week 5
February 2012, Week 4
February 2012, Week 3
February 2012, Week 2
February 2012, Week 1
January 2012, Week 5
January 2012, Week 4
January 2012, Week 3
January 2012, Week 2
January 2012, Week 1
December 2011, Week 5
December 2011, Week 4
December 2011, Week 3
December 2011, Week 2
December 2011, Week 1
November 2011, Week 5
November 2011, Week 4
November 2011, Week 3
November 2011, Week 2
November 2011, Week 1
October 2011, Week 5
October 2011, Week 4
October 2011, Week 3
October 2011, Week 2
October 2011, Week 1
September 2011, Week 5
September 2011, Week 4
September 2011, Week 3
September 2011, Week 2
September 2011, Week 1
August 2011, Week 5
August 2011, Week 4
August 2011, Week 3
August 2011, Week 2
August 2011, Week 1
July 2011, Week 5
July 2011, Week 4
July 2011, Week 3
July 2011, Week 2
July 2011, Week 1
June 2011, Week 5
June 2011, Week 4
June 2011, Week 3
June 2011, Week 2
June 2011, Week 1
May 2011, Week 5
May 2011, Week 4
May 2011, Week 3
May 2011, Week 2
May 2011, Week 1
April 2011, Week 5
April 2011, Week 4
April 2011, Week 3
April 2011, Week 2
April 2011, Week 1
March 2011, Week 5
March 2011, Week 4
March 2011, Week 3
March 2011, Week 2
March 2011, Week 1
February 2011, Week 4
February 2011, Week 3
February 2011, Week 2
February 2011, Week 1
January 2011, Week 5
January 2011, Week 4
January 2011, Week 3
January 2011, Week 2
January 2011, Week 1
December 2010, Week 5
December 2010, Week 4
December 2010, Week 3
December 2010, Week 2
December 2010, Week 1
November 2010, Week 5
November 2010, Week 4
November 2010, Week 3
November 2010, Week 2
November 2010, Week 1
October 2010, Week 5
October 2010, Week 4
October 2010, Week 3
October 2010, Week 2
October 2010, Week 1
September 2010, Week 5
September 2010, Week 4
September 2010, Week 3
September 2010, Week 2
September 2010, Week 1
August 2010, Week 5
August 2010, Week 4
August 2010, Week 3
August 2010, Week 2
August 2010, Week 1
July 2010, Week 5
July 2010, Week 4
July 2010, Week 3
July 2010, Week 2
July 2010, Week 1

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.PORTSIDE.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager