New Pipeline to Challenge Obama's Promises 

By Bill McKibben*
Inter Press Service
August 9, 2011

http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=56790

RIPTON, Vermont, Aug 9, 2011 (IPS/Al-Jazeera) - It took some
serious digging in the sock drawer, but eventually I found my
'Environmentalists for Obama' button left over from the '08
campaign. I needed it because I'm headed to Washington in a
couple of weeks to get arrested in front of the White House,
and I wanted to make sure I wouldn't be misunderstood.

I'm not alone - as many as a thousand people will risk arrest
in daily protests at the White House over the last two weeks
of August, making it the largest outbreak of civil
disobedience in recent environmental history.

The target: a proposed 2,400 km pipeline from the tar sands
of Alberta to the Gulf of Mexico. Those tar sands are the
largest pool of carbon on the continent; the federal
government's pre-eminent climate scientist, James Hansen,
said recently that if we begin burning it in large
quantities, it's "essentially game over" for the climate.

The politics

So in scientific terms it's a no-brainer (in fact, earlier
this week more than a dozen of the nation's most senior
climate scientists weighed in against the proposed pipeline).
But in political terms? That's harder, because there's
serious money at stake.

Since the first permit must come from the State Department,
for instance, it's probably no wonder that the pipeline
consortium hired Hilary Clinton's former deputy campaign
director as its chief lobbyist. And indeed, even before any
data was collected, the secretary of state said she was
'inclined' to grant the permit.

There's real worry that the fix is in, especially since
recently released WikiLeaks documents show American officials
working with the tar sands companies to develop a strategy to
'spin' reporters and win favourable press coverage.

Still - the ultimate decision will rest with President Obama.
Hence the sit-ins. And the buttons.

Because when you get right down to it, Obama has been a great
enigma on the greatest crisis we've ever faced: the rapidly
escalating heating of the planet.

On the one hand, his first stimulus package set aside some
money for green investment (though a much smaller percentage
than, say, China). And he's worked to persuade the auto
companies he bailed out to raise mileage levels for their
cars in the future.

But this is the guy who - the night he won the presidential
nomination - said that with his ascension "the rise of the
oceans would begin to slow, and the planet begin to heal". By
that standard, he's not even close.

Not keeping promises

Earlier this year he opened up a vast swath of Wyoming to new
coal mining. And he barely offered even lip service in
support of the climate bill that foundered in the Senate; in
the words of the widely-respected climate blogger Joe Romm,
"Obama's overall record on energy and the environment
deserves an F. Fundamentally, he let die our best chance to
preserve a liveable climate and restore US leadership in
clean energy - without a serious fight."

Of course, Obama can say with some justification that his
weak record on the environment results in part from having to
work with a Congress so dominated by the fossil fuel industry
that it voted earlier this year to deny the very existence of
global warming.

Which is why this pipeline question is so politically key:
this time, Obama gets to make the decision all by himself. He
doesn't have to answer to Oklahoma Senator Inhofe ("global
warming is a hoax") or Rep. Michelle Bachmann ("It's all
voodoo, nonsense, hokum").

Because the pipeline crosses our border, he needs to sign a
finding that it's in the national interest - and if he
doesn't, then the Tea Party can't force him. The right wing
has made it clear it wants the pipeline built, but unlike the
recent debt ceiling negotiations, it has no leverage. It's
all on Obama this time.

Which is why we'll be outside his house this August. Because
we want to believe in the words of that skinny senator from
Illinois during his campaign; because we want to show him the
depth of the support he can call on if he stands up just this
once to the fossil fuel industry. I'll wear my button with
pride - and a little trepidation too.

* Bill McKibben is one of the founders of tarsandsaction.org,
which is organising this month's civil disobedience.

___________________________________________

Portside aims to provide material of interest to people
on the left that will help them to interpret the world
and to change it.

Submit via email: [log in to unmask]

Submit via the Web: http://portside.org/submittous3

Frequently asked questions: http://portside.org/faq

Sub/Unsub: http://portside.org/subscribe-and-unsubscribe

Search Portside archives: http://portside.org/archive

Contribute to Portside: https://portside.org/donate