|
|
|
Portside Special - Reflections on AFSCME's 40th Convention:
Public Employees Elect New Leader in a Time of Crisis
By Gregory N. Heires and Ray Markey
Special to Portside
Published by Portside
June 26, 2012
LOS ANGELES - The country's largest public employee union
has elected its first African-American president, who stands
to become perhaps the leading voice in organized labor's
fight- back against the fiercest attack on government
workers and services in modern times.
Lee A. Saunders, who started out his career as a civil
servant in Cleveland and rose over the years to became the
top assistant to Gerald W. McEntee, the colorful outgoing
president of the American Federation of State, County and
Municipal Employees, was overwhelmingly elected to head the
union at its 40th convention, which was held in Los Angeles
June 18-22.
Two years ago, Saunders narrowly defeated Danny Donohue,
head of Civil Service Employees Association Local 1000 of
New York, in a hotly contest election for secretary-
treasurer. But this time he handily knocked off Donohue for
the top post.
The 2012 election was the first contested election in
AFSCME, which is celebrating its 75th anniversary this year,
in more than 30 years and the second time in which a white
candidate and a black candidate squared off for the
presidency.
In his first election, McEntee defeated William Lucy, who
went on to become the union's long-time secretary-treasurer,
president of the AFL-CIO constituency group Coalition of
Black Trade Unionists and founding president of Public
Services International.
The roots of this year's election extend at least as far
back as to the 2004 convention. That's when Lucy announced
his retirement. Donohue and Saunders quickly announced that
they would run to succeed Lucy, but they withdrew after
delegates convinced Lucy to continue as secretary-treasurer.
This time around, what once was a sub-rosa campaign to
portray Saunders as a McEntee clone became a focus of the
campaign.
Donohue also vigorously argued that Saunders' election would
cement the union's inside-the-beltway political orientation,
draining funds for local and state needs. In fact, as
Saunders pointed out, AFSCME allocates two-thirds of its
political action funds to state and local races.
The Donohue supporters claimed Saunders along with McEntee
had turned AFSCME into a cog in the Democratic Party machine
and that this had been a disaster for AFSCME. They implied
that if only the union had been willing to be more even-
handed in its support of Republicans, public employees would
be in better shape.
This is pure rubbish. In speech after speech at the
convention, Saunders stressed that the union will respond
with equal force to attacks on its members, whether the
attacks are from Democrats or Republicans.
So what explains Donohue supporters' bogus suggestion that
McEntee and Saunders are Democratic lackeys? The answer is
clear: They were appealing to the conservative wing of
AFSCME, the estimated 30 percent of union members who vote
Republican.
Much of the venom of the Donohue camp seemed to be "anti-
McEntee" and less reflective of a clearly articulated
platform. But the Donohue backers couldn't get that poison
to stick on Saunders, who seemed to win over undecided
delegates through his convention speeches in his role as
secretary- treasurer and as a candidate at the presidential
debate, as well as through his speech as at a rally for a
contract fight of University of California workers. (An
AFSCME convention custom is to devote an afternoon to the
struggle of local workers at the host city.)
At the convention, Saunders was unapologetic about AFSCME's
willingness to open up its checkbook to ensure that the
union is a leading progressive voice in national politics.
But he also underscored his commitment to: * building upon
the union's growing multi-cultural membership base,? *
empowering women, who make up the majority of the labor
movement and AFSCME, * training and providing opportunities
for the union's young "New Wave" activists, * strengthening
retiree participation, * responding aggressively to the
conservative and anti-union agenda of Republican and
Democratic governors and * pouring resources into organizing
campaigns (which have added 50,000 new members to AFSME's
ranks the last two years).
Both sides clearly recognize that today, AFSCME's survival
is on the line.
The debate is about the appropriate response.
The union confronts a concerted right-wing attack on
collective bargaining rights, the ability of the union to
collect dues and political contributions through payroll
deductions, and the success of Grover Norquist's "starve the
beast" strategy to eviscerate public services. State and
local cutbacks during the Great Recession have reduced the
union's membership by tens of thousands.
AFSCME remains deeply wounded from Wisconsin Gov. Scott
Walker's signing of a law stripping public employees of
their collective bargaining rights along with his subsequent
strong defeat of an AFSCME-backed recall effort.
Confronted with this bleak picture, many delegates seemed to
be focused on the gravity of the national political scene
and were apparently not won over by Donohue's effort to make
the allocation of union resources the central issue of the
election.
Simply put, Donohue wasn't able to capitalize on what his
supporters perceived as a deep simmering resentment over the
national union's control of funds. At the same time, while
acknowledging the setback in Wisconsin, Saunders was able to
argue that the fight-back there has reinvigorated the labor
movement. Also, he was able to point to the union's
successful campaign for a referendum on Republican Gov. John
Kasich's anti-collective bargaining legislation in Ohio and
another campaign to scuttle Gov. Rick Scott's prison
privatization initiative in Florida.
So, while McEntee, a pillar of the Democratic Party's
progressive wing, clearly was a Washington insider, AFSCME
cannot be charged with neglecting what's happening on the
ground throughout in country, Donohue's claims to the
contrary. And Activists know this.
AFSCME has poured millions of dollars into 12 "battleground
states" where governors (including New York's Democratic
Gov. Andrew Cuomo) have directly confronted the union,
playing into resentment toward public employees.
Behind the scenes and on the convention floor, both camps
played political hardball by questioning credentials of
delegates.
Also, Donohue backers accused AFSCME of following the
practice of former SEIU President Andrew Stern to install
political allies in affiliates through trusteeships. But his
campaign didn't detail its charges in public documents or
statements.
The AFSCME Constitution restricts trusteeships to cases
involving financial improprieties and decertification
revolts. Only 18 of AFSCME's locals are in trusteeship.
While Saunders could take credit for running the union's
legislative and political ground game in battleground
states, what did Donohue offer?
Critics pointed to his lack of visibility in the national
union's fight-back activities. He failed to articulate a
powerful and comprehensive alternative path. And he
certainly couldn't point to his recent track record.
Donohue's current five-year contract for CSEA members
includes three zeroes, furloughs and increased member's
payments into health and pension funds, and health-care
givebacks. The CSEA pact has boxed in other unions in New
York, where public employee unions and employers generally
follow the practice of "pattern bargaining" in which one
union's pact sets the parameters of the negotiating climate
for all unions.
Moreover, CSEA agreed to a new pension tier for its members
at the end of the term of Cuomo's predecessor, Democratic
Gov. David Paterson. That set the stage for Cuomo to ram
through a widely criticized pension tier for all the public
employees in the state a year later. The new tier requires
public employees to work longer (as many as 12 years) and
contribute more (as much as double) for a pension that
provides less (up to 40 percent).
Tellingly, five of the six AFSCME affiliates in New York
backed Saunders.
Donohue opponents charge that CSEA's concessionary
bargaining will ultimately translate into a lower standard
of living for more than 400,000 public employees and the
undermining of the retirement security of future public
service workers in the state.
Saunders' election takes on a special symbolism in AFSCME,
which prides itself on its diversity and support for civil
rights. Indeed, a New York City retiree poignantly shared
with us how she offered a prayer for Saunders the night
before his election.
Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated when he traveled to
Memphis, Tenn., in 1968 to support striking African-American
sanitation workers in the union. And William Lucy
spearheaded the U.S. labor movement's campaign to free
Nelson Mandela in South Africa.
The candidate slates in the election reflected the union's
diversity. Saunders ran with Laura M. Reyes, who heads the
65,000-strong United Domestic Workers Local 3930 in
California. Donohue ran with Alice Goff, an African
American, who is the president of Council 36, which
represents city and county employees in many titles in
Southern California.
Saunders defeated Donohue by 54 to 46 percent; winning
683,628 votes compared with 582,358 for Donohue, who
received the lowest vote of the four candidates. Reyes
defeated Goff by 661,413 votes to 603,624.
Under AFSCME election rules, the delegate votes represent a
number of AFSCME members, not an individual. Virtually all
unions in the AFL-CIO, including AFSCME, hold conventions
with delegates to elect their top officers. Alone among
major unions, the Teamsters hold direct, mail-ballot
elections.
With just over 200,000 members in CSEA, Donohue only managed
to get the support of 380,000 AFSCME members outside his
local, while Saunders won double that without an electoral
base.
But for all the union's pride in its diversity and roots in
the civil rights struggle, the election, couldn't escape the
politics of race.
A controversy erupted the eve before the vote when a Donohue
supporter supposedly hung a stuffed toy monkey identified as
Saunders on a convention pole, sparking charges of racism.
Donohue didn't do himself a favor when he appeared on the
floor and declared that if "anyone accuses me of being a
racist, I will kiss your ass." Some activists believe the
comment cost him African-American votes.
(Days later, an offended New York City African-American
local president said he strongly considered dropping his
pants on stage before exercising self-restraint.)
When the convention opened, most delegates appeared to think
the election was pretty even. The afternoon before the
election, the word was the candidates were separated by
9,000 votes.
What explains the big swing for Saunders?
Many believe a lot of African-Americans deserted Donohue.
Members sitting on the fence apparently were turned off by
vitriolic attacks on the floor of the convention and the
failure of Donohue to chart an alternative path for the
union in the debate.
Will both sides live up to their commitment to a healing
process?
Union leaders and activists are known for their long
memories. Meanwhile, AFSCME is ready to continue the fight-
back.
"We know that Wall Street and their allies are engaged in an
all-out assault against our members and the services we
provide," Saunders said after the election.
"They know that AFSCME stands in the way of their efforts to
destroy the middle class. We are united in our commitment to
stand up for the men and women who care for America's
children, nurse the sick, plow our streets, collect the
household trash and guard our prisons. Our members are a
cross-section of America, not some elite group as our
opponents try to claim.
"We are energized and ready for the battles ahead, including
putting boots on the ground to ensure the re-election of
President Barack Obama."
[Labor Portside moderators Gregory N. Heires and Ray Markey
attended AFSCME's 40th Convention in Los Angeles. Heires is
a long-time, trade-union writer. Markey is a former
president of the New York Public Library Guild Local 1930,
one of more than 50 locals in AFSCME DC 37 in New York.]
==========
___________________________________________
Portside aims to provide material of interest to people
on the left that will help them to interpret the world
and to change it.
Submit via email: [log in to unmask]
Submit via the Web: http://portside.org/submittous3
Frequently asked questions: http://portside.org/faq
Sub/Unsub: http://portside.org/subscribe-and-unsubscribe
Search Portside archives: http://portside.org/archive
Contribute to Portside: https://portside.org/donate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archives |
June 2013, Week 3 June 2013, Week 2 June 2013, Week 1 May 2013, Week 5 May 2013, Week 4 May 2013, Week 3 May 2013, Week 2 May 2013, Week 1 April 2013, Week 5 April 2013, Week 4 April 2013, Week 3 April 2013, Week 2 April 2013, Week 1 March 2013, Week 5 March 2013, Week 4 March 2013, Week 3 March 2013, Week 2 March 2013, Week 1 February 2013, Week 4 February 2013, Week 3 February 2013, Week 2 February 2013, Week 1 January 2013, Week 5 January 2013, Week 4 January 2013, Week 3 January 2013, Week 2 January 2013, Week 1 December 2012, Week 5 December 2012, Week 4 December 2012, Week 3 December 2012, Week 2 December 2012, Week 1 November 2012, Week 5 November 2012, Week 4 November 2012, Week 3 November 2012, Week 2 November 2012, Week 1 October 2012, Week 5 October 2012, Week 4 October 2012, Week 3 October 2012, Week 2 October 2012, Week 1 September 2012, Week 5 September 2012, Week 4 September 2012, Week 3 September 2012, Week 2 September 2012, Week 1 August 2012, Week 5 August 2012, Week 4 August 2012, Week 3 August 2012, Week 2 August 2012, Week 1 July 2012, Week 5 July 2012, Week 4 July 2012, Week 3 July 2012, Week 2 July 2012, Week 1 June 2012, Week 5 June 2012, Week 4 June 2012, Week 3 June 2012, Week 2 June 2012, Week 1 May 2012, Week 5 May 2012, Week 4 May 2012, Week 3 May 2012, Week 2 May 2012, Week 1 April 2012, Week 5 April 2012, Week 4 April 2012, Week 3 April 2012, Week 2 April 2012, Week 1 March 2012, Week 5 March 2012, Week 4 March 2012, Week 3 March 2012, Week 2 March 2012, Week 1 February 2012, Week 5 February 2012, Week 4 February 2012, Week 3 February 2012, Week 2 February 2012, Week 1 January 2012, Week 5 January 2012, Week 4 January 2012, Week 3 January 2012, Week 2 January 2012, Week 1 December 2011, Week 5 December 2011, Week 4 December 2011, Week 3 December 2011, Week 2 December 2011, Week 1 November 2011, Week 5 November 2011, Week 4 November 2011, Week 3 November 2011, Week 2 November 2011, Week 1 October 2011, Week 5 October 2011, Week 4 October 2011, Week 3 October 2011, Week 2 October 2011, Week 1 September 2011, Week 5 September 2011, Week 4 September 2011, Week 3 September 2011, Week 2 September 2011, Week 1 August 2011, Week 5 August 2011, Week 4 August 2011, Week 3 August 2011, Week 2 August 2011, Week 1 July 2011, Week 5 July 2011, Week 4 July 2011, Week 3 July 2011, Week 2 July 2011, Week 1 June 2011, Week 5 June 2011, Week 4 June 2011, Week 3 June 2011, Week 2 June 2011, Week 1 May 2011, Week 5 May 2011, Week 4 May 2011, Week 3 May 2011, Week 2 May 2011, Week 1 April 2011, Week 5 April 2011, Week 4 April 2011, Week 3 April 2011, Week 2 April 2011, Week 1 March 2011, Week 5 March 2011, Week 4 March 2011, Week 3 March 2011, Week 2 March 2011, Week 1 February 2011, Week 4 February 2011, Week 3 February 2011, Week 2 February 2011, Week 1 January 2011, Week 5 January 2011, Week 4 January 2011, Week 3 January 2011, Week 2 January 2011, Week 1 December 2010, Week 5 December 2010, Week 4 December 2010, Week 3 December 2010, Week 2 December 2010, Week 1 November 2010, Week 5 November 2010, Week 4 November 2010, Week 3 November 2010, Week 2 November 2010, Week 1 October 2010, Week 5 October 2010, Week 4 October 2010, Week 3 October 2010, Week 2 October 2010, Week 1 September 2010, Week 5 September 2010, Week 4 September 2010, Week 3 September 2010, Week 2 September 2010, Week 1 August 2010, Week 5 August 2010, Week 4 August 2010, Week 3 August 2010, Week 2 August 2010, Week 1 July 2010, Week 5 July 2010, Week 4 July 2010, Week 3 July 2010, Week 2 July 2010, Week 1
|
|